Patterns of treatment utilization and sequencing across lines of therapy in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM): Real-world evidence from the United States

EHA 2026 WM Poster

Prashant Kapoor, MD

DISCLAIMER

The contents of the presentations above are designed for educational and scientific exchange purposes and are not promotional. They may contain information on investigational products or investigational uses of approved products. No conclusions regarding safety and/or efficacy for such investigational products or uses may be made.

SUMMARY

This retrospective observational study evaluated realworld treatment utilization, sequencing patterns, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) in the United States. Using the US Symphony Integrated Dataverse® database, 7,583 patients who initiated firstline therapy between January 2020 and August 2025 were identified. Of these, 2,251 patients (29.7%) initiated secondline therapy and 976 (12.9%) initiated third or later lines. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) were the most frequently used drug class across all lines of therapy, with zanubrutinib used most commonly and with increasing utilization over time. In firstline therapy, bendamustinebased chemotherapy was most common (27.1%), followed by rituximab monotherapy (22.3%) and zanubrutinib (19.6%). Treatment sequencing patterns suggest that in patients with WM who received first-line BTKi, bendamustinebased chemotherapy was the most common subsequent treatment (42.7% after first-line zanubrutinib, 22.2% after first-line ibrutinib). Conversely, for patients who received first-line bendamustinebased chemotherapy, BTKis were the most common second-line regimen (zanubrutinib 35.6%; ibrutinib 16.4%). Healthcare resource utilization was substantial across lines of therapy, with lower perpatientperyear outpatient visit rates reported for BTKibased regimens compared with bendamustine or rituximabbased regimens.

Population Intervention Comparator Outcome Measures
Adults in the United States with Waldenström macroglobulinemia who initiated systemic therapy between January 2020 and August 2025 Bendamustine-based chemotherapy, rituximab-monotherapy, other rituximab-combinations (including R-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, and other combinations), Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (zanubrutinib, ibrutinib)-, bortezomib-, venetoclax-based regimens, and other regimens N/A Treatment utilization, sequencing, and associated healthcare resource utilization

FAQs

The objective of this realworld study was to evaluate treatment utilization, sequencing patterns, and associated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM).

A retrospective observational analysis was conducted using the US Symphony Integrated Dataverse® database. Adults with ≥1 WM diagnostic code who initiated treatment between January 2020 and August 2025 were identified. Patients were categorized into eight mutually exclusive treatmentregimen groups, including bendamustinebased chemotherapy, rituximab monotherapy, other rituximabbased combinations, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)–based regimens, bortezomibbased regimens, venetoclaxbased regimens, and other therapies. Treatment utilization was analyzed overall, by calendar year, and by line of therapy (LOT), with sequencing patterns visualized using Sankey diagrams. All-cause HCRU during treatment (inpatient, outpatient, and other medical/hospital services) was examined and reported per-patient-per-year.

Among 7,583 patients who initiated firstline therapy, 29.7% progressed to secondline therapy and 12.9% to third or later lines. BTKi was the most commonly used drug class across all lines of therapy, with zanubrutinib used most frequently and with increasing utilization over time. In firstline therapy, bendamustinebased chemotherapy was most common (27.1%), followed by rituximab monotherapy (22.3%) and zanubrutinib (19.6%). In second and thirdline settings, rituximab monotherapy was the most commonly used regimen (19.9% and 20.3%, respectively), followed by BTKibased regimens. Sequencing analyses showed that patients treated with firstline BTKi frequently received bendamustinebased chemotherapy as subsequent therapy (42.7% after first-line zanubrutinib, 22.2% after first-line ibrutinib), while those treated initially with bendamustinebased chemotherapy most often received BTKis in the second line (zanubrutinib 35.6%; ibrutinib 16.4%). Substantial HCRU was observed across LOTs. Outpatient visits per patient per year were lower for BTKibased regimens compared with bendamustinebased or rituximabbased regimens across all lines of therapy. Mean inpatient visit rates were also lowest for BTKibased regimens, while the highest inpatient utilization was observed with venetoclax and bortezomibbased regimens.

You are now leaving the website

This link is provided for information purposes only. You’ll be leaving beonemedaffairs.com and accessing a third-party website over which [BeOne Medicines | GmbH] has no control or influence.

This link will take you to a third-party website outside of beonemedaffairs.com.

[BeOne Medicines | GmbH] has no control over this website and makes no representations regarding its content or availability in your location. [BeOne Medicines | GmbH] declines any responsibility for third-party information, data usage policies, or personal data processing.

By proceeding, you acknowledge that you are part of the intended audience of the third-party website and confirm your compliance with applicable laws.

Do you want to leave beonemedaffairs.com

You are now leaving the the website beonemedaffairs.com and entering another BeOne website with different terms of use. Information included on this website may not be specific to your country. Click Continue to proceed