Associations between ECOG performance status and patient-reported outcomes in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: Post hoc analysis from the ALPINE trial

EHA 2026 CLL/SLL Zanubrutinib Poster

Nicole Lamanna, MD

DISCLAIMER

The contents of the presentations above are designed for educational and scientific exchange purposes and are not promotional. They may contain information on investigational products or investigational uses of approved products. No conclusions regarding safety and/or efficacy for such investigational products or uses may be made.

SUMMARY

This posthoc analysis from the ALPINE trial evaluated associations between baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) categories and multidomain patientreported outcome (PRO) profiles in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. Baseline PRO data from 627 patients were pooled across treatment arms and analyzed across ECOG PS categories 0, 1, and 2. Multivariate profile analysis demonstrated significant differences in PRO profiles by ECOG PS, rejecting parallelism, equal overall levels, and flatness (all P<0.001). Physical functioning, role functioning, and fatigue showed the most consistent differentiation across all ECOG PS contrasts (0 vs 1, 0 vs 2, and 1 vs 2; all P<0.001). Additional significant differences were observed for global health status (0 vs 1, P=0.001; 0 vs 2, P=0.001), pain (0 vs 1, P=0.008; 0 vs 2, P=0.019), and insomnia (0 vs 1, P=0.004). VAS scores also differed significantly by ECOG PS (0 vs 1, P=0.001; 0 vs 2, P=0.001; 1 vs 2, P=0.040). No associations were seen for nausea/vomiting, while no associations were observed for nausea/vomiting. Logistic regression analyses showed that greater baseline PRO impairment across multiple domains was associated with higher odds of worse ECOG PS classification.

Population Intervention Comparator Outcome Measures
Patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma enrolled in the ALPINE trial Zanubrutinib Ibrutinib Associations between baseline PRO impairment and ECOG PS classification

FAQs

The objective of this posthoc analysis from the ALPINE trial was to assess the relationships between baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) categories and multidomain patientreported outcome (PRO) profiles in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.

Baseline (pretreatment) PRO data were pooled across treatment arms (zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib) from 627 patients enrolled in the ALPINE trial. Seven domains from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (Global Health Status, physical functioning, role functioning, fatigue, pain, insomnia, and nausea/vomiting) and visual analog scale scores from the EQ5D5L were analyzed, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Profile analysis using oneway multivariate analysis of variance compared PRO profiles across ECOG PS categories (0, 1, and 2), including three hierarchical hypothesis tests: (1) parallelism (profile shape across domains); (2) levels (mean differences between groups); (3) flatness (similarity of domain means overall [no difference vs. domain differentiated]). Domainlevel contrasts were assessed using ttests. Bivariate logistic regression analyses evaluated associations between baseline PRO impairment scores and ECOG PS classification as a sensitivity analysis.

PRO profiles differed significantly across ECOG PS categories, with rejection of parallelism, equal overall levels, and flatness (all P<0.001). Physical functioning, role functioning, and fatigue showed the most consistent separation, with significant differences across all ECOG PS contrasts (0 vs 1, 0 vs 2, and 1 vs 2; all P<0.001). Additional significant differences were observed for Global Health Status (0 vs 1 and 0 vs 2; P=0.001), pain (0 vs 1, P=0.008; 0 vs 2, P=0.019), and insomnia (0 vs 1, P=0.004). VAS scores also differed significantly by ECOG PS (0 vs 1, P=0.001; 0 vs 2, P=0.001; 1 vs 2, P=0.040). No associations were observed for nausea/vomiting. In logistic regression analyses, higher baseline impairment in physical functioning (OR 1.48; 95% CI, 1.34–1.79), role functioning (OR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.22–1.34), and fatigue (OR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10–1.34) was associated with higher odds of worse ECOG PS (all P<0.001), with additional significant associations for Global Health Status (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.22–1.48; P<0.001), pain (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.10–1.22; P=0.001), insomnia (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00–1.22; P<0.001), and VAS (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; P<0.001).

You are now leaving the website

This link is provided for information purposes only. You’ll be leaving beonemedaffairs.com and accessing a third-party website over which [BeOne Medicines | GmbH] has no control or influence.

This link will take you to a third-party website outside of beonemedaffairs.com.

[BeOne Medicines | GmbH] has no control over this website and makes no representations regarding its content or availability in your location. [BeOne Medicines | GmbH] declines any responsibility for third-party information, data usage policies, or personal data processing.

By proceeding, you acknowledge that you are part of the intended audience of the third-party website and confirm your compliance with applicable laws.

Do you want to leave beonemedaffairs.com

You are now leaving the the website beonemedaffairs.com and entering another BeOne website with different terms of use. Information included on this website may not be specific to your country. Click Continue to proceed